Boomers

November 30, 2020
Journalist Andrews debuts with a scathing critique of the baby boomer generation’s “dismal legacy.” Describing the “boomer revolution” as “the most dramatic sundering of Western civilization since the Protestant Reformation,” she examines the fallout of the 1960s in bracing profiles of six public figures. In Andrews’s view, Apple cofounder Steve Jobs represents Silicon Valley’s mix of “idealism and obnoxiousness,” screenwriter Aaron Sorkin embodies the ideological conformity of Hollywood, and economist Jeffrey Sachs personifies the hypocrisy of American policy makers in their continuation of colonialist practices under the auspices of liberalism and globalization. Andrews also cites the ubiquity of online pornography as evidence that the sexual revolution backfired, claims that race relations have stagnated and even gone backwards in recent years, and blames liberal Supreme Court justices for “demolish long-standing precedent... to give their humanitarian sentiments free rein.” She concludes with a passionate, albeit despondent, call for millennials to “break free” from the influence of the 1960s and stop believing that “narcissism is the highest form of patriotism.” Andrews makes some incisive points about baby boomer hubris, but undermines her argument with glaring omissions (the antiwar movement, for instance) and one-sided data points. Conservatives will rally to Andrews’s caustic appraisal of the culture wars; liberals need not apply. Agent: William Callahan, InkWell Management.

December 15, 2020
A cultural critic offers a takedown of baby boomers. In a book modeled on Lytton Strachey's Eminent Victorians (1918), Andrews delivers a millennial's arguments against the boomers and their lofty ideals. Though the author's idea is well conceived, the narrative suffers from disorganization and conservative pieties. Rather than broadly attacking a vast and complex generation, Andrews wisely sets her sights on six well-known targets: Steve Jobs, Aaron Sorkin, Jeffrey Sachs, Camille Paglia, Al Sharpton, and Sonia Sotomayor. These figures give the author the opportunity to tee off on many of her b�tes noires, including Silicon Valley, school busing, and the idea that pop culture should be taken seriously. The narrative is a loosely organized collection of essays, the best of which is the one about Sorkin, in a fairly conservative intellectual vein; it's well researched and written with brio and attitude but not enough cohesion. A few of these pieces loop back to the boomer premise in only the most superficial way, with a paragraph about boomers inserted seemingly as an afterthought. Andrews lays out her case clearly in the preface: "They inherited prosperity, social cohesion and functioning institutions. They passed on debt, inequality, moribund churches, and a broken democracy....The boomers should not be allowed to shuffle off the world stage until they have been made to regret" their failures. The prose is mostly engaging, but sometimes the author simply misses the mark--e.g., when she tries to take down James Baldwin: "Baldwin's writing was inspired not by oppression but by his personal neuroses...his error was to project his pain onto the black experience." Were Baldwin still alive, he might remind Andrews that he's not a boomer. For a more incisive exploration of the millennial-boomer rift, try Anne Helen Petersen's Can't Even (2020). Andrews is fair in much of her criticism, but one wishes for a more cogent argument.

COPYRIGHT(2020) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.