
Year of Meteors
Stephen Douglas, Abraham Lincoln, and the Election That Brought on the Civil War
کتاب های مرتبط
- اطلاعات
- نقد و بررسی
- دیدگاه کاربران
نقد و بررسی

August 2, 2010
The center could not hold amid a flood of passionate intensity recorded in this illuminating study of the 1860 election campaign. Historian Egerton (Death or Liberty) chronicles the year’s chaotic political wranglings, from the fractious party conventions that threw up four presidential contenders (two from minor parties) to the search for a congressional compromise to save the Union on the eve of Lincoln’s inauguration. An energized antislavery Republican Party supported Lincoln, unwittingly aided by cagey Southern radicals William Yancey and Robert Rhett, who, Egerton argues, conspired to split their own Democratic party in order to guarantee Lincoln’s victory and thus obtain a pretext for secession. In the doomed middle are Stephen Douglas and other moderates trying to preserve the nation with proslavery compromises that infuriated the North without appeasing the South. This is politics as high drama, and Egerton does it justice with his lucid, meticulous account of backroom deals, parliamentary brawling, and speeches whose rhetorical vitriol (one Republican convention speaker called Southerners “the whole vassalage of hell”) presaged violence. Also fine is Egerton’s analysis of the human motivations that tore the country apart. B&w illus.

January 1, 2015
Egerton reveals how chance and contingency, as much as design, set the political course in the critical 1860 election. He challenges Doris Kearns Goodwin's argument (see p. 47) that Lincoln selected his cabinet to balance rivals, arguing instead that geography mattered most. (LJ 9/15/10)
Copyright 2015 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.
دیدگاه کاربران