Redeeming the Great Emancipator

Redeeming the Great Emancipator
افزودن به بوکمارک اشتراک گذاری 0 دیدگاه کاربران 5 (0)

مشارکت: عنوان و توضیح کوتاه هر کتاب را ترجمه کنید این ترجمه بعد از تایید با نام شما در سایت نمایش داده خواهد شد.
iran گزارش تخلف

فرمت کتاب

audiobook

تاریخ انتشار

2016

نویسنده

Allen C. Guelzo

شابک

9781520000442
  • اطلاعات
  • نقد و بررسی
  • دیدگاه کاربران
برای مطالعه توضیحات وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

نقد و بررسی

AudioFile Magazine
Originally presented as a series of lectures at Harvard University by the author, who is a noted Civil War historian, this examination of Lincoln's anti-slavery credentials and the persistence of racism transitions easily to an audio format. Will Damron's narration is deliberate and poignant as Guelzo examines the political environment of the period and the development of Lincoln's thinking as he reached the point of issuing the Emancipation Proclamation. With a pace and timbre that match the significance of the times, Damron escorts the listener through the issues surrounding Lincoln's dedication to abolition and examines the tumultuous racial issues still facing the country today. Damron's narration so aptly captures Guelzo's passion for Lincoln that listening, while not the same as being present at Harvard for the lectures, provides a close second. M.L.R. © AudioFile 2016, Portland, Maine

Publisher's Weekly

December 7, 2015
Guelzo (Gettysburg: The Last Invasion), a professor of the Civil War era at Gettysburg College, argues that understanding why Lincoln still merits the title of Great Emancipator is essential to healthy race relations in the U.S., explaining his rationale with three lectures he gave at Harvard in 2012. He begins with a review of the significance of emancipation, and the evidence, which he finds compelling, that Lincoln was deeply committed to ending slavery. Guelzo carefully parses and contextualizes Lincoln’s statements and personality, noting that the “problem with our apprehension of Lincoln’s antislavery is that he seems to have gone about it in what we would regard as a bafflingly obtuse fashion.” For example, Lincoln did not view slavery as primarily a racial issue, but as a political and economic one. Guelzo responds to critics of Lincoln’s lack of racial empathy by noting that the president was “the wrong man for expressions of empathy on almost any subject.” Addressing the controversy surrounding demands for reparations for descendants of slaves, Guelzo also illustrates his conviction that students of history must not allow simplicity to crowd out complexity, pointing out the issues that make identifying the affected class a challenge. Guelzo’s exploration of Lincoln’s reputation is both accessible and thought provoking.




دیدگاه کاربران

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید
|