The Eichmann Trial
کتاب های مرتبط
- اطلاعات
- نقد و بررسی
- دیدگاه کاربران
نقد و بررسی
This book has multiple personalities. First, it's a superb chronicle of the trial of Nazi Adolf Eichmann. Second, it's about author Deborah Lipstadt's personal journey and the British libel trial about the book's content. Third, it's a story about Hannah Arendt, a Jewish philosopher with controversial and divisive views about the Holocaust. From an audiobook listener's perspective, the book has numerous shortcomings. First, there's the question why the book, written in the first person by a woman, is narrated by a man. Second, reader Walter Dixon's dry style is too detached for the controversial subject. And finally, multiple mispronunciations distract from the book's accounts. All in all, this work may not be for everyone. D.J.S. (c) AudioFile 2011, Portland, Maine
January 17, 2011
For the Eichmann trial's 50th anniversary, Emory Holocaust studies professor Lipstadt (History on Trial: My Day in Court with David Irving) trains her gaze on this watershed event in Jewish history. Israeli attorney general Gideon Hausner, a commercial lawyer, lacked criminal or courtroom expertise, but Lipstadt contends that despite a couple of courtroom blunders, Hausner presented overwhelming incriminating evidence to prove that Eichmann's claim that he was just a low-level bureaucrat was a lie. Moreover, Hausner's decision to place victims' testimony center stage gave survivors an iconic authority. Lipstadt discounts critics who say Hausner failed to elicit an admission of guilt from Eichmann, believing it didn't matter because a confession from a brazen liar is worthless. In Eichmann's memoirs, contrary to claims made by Hannah Arendt, Lipstadt finds that he expresses himself as an inveterate Nazi and anti-Semite fully committed to his leaders' goals. Lipstadt also finds Arendt's famous New Yorker reportage on the trial disturbing because Arendt failed to reveal that she was absent for much of the trial, writing from transcripts that cannot convey subtleties of demeanor witnessed in court. This is a penetrating and authoritative dissection of a landmark case and its after effects.
دیدگاه کاربران