Wrong and Dangerous

September 15, 2012
Disgusted by what he calls the Far Right's drive to destroy the Constitution in the name of saving' it, law professor Epps offers spirited and sarcastic rebuttals to 10 hot-button claims that conservative commentators tend to advance about the Constitution. In one chapter, for example, Epps picks apart the idea that the Constitution does not provide for separation of church and state; in others, he takes on the recently popular notion that the Second Amendment was intended to make government fear its constituents, and he knocks down recently rewarmed claims about the obsolescence of the Fourteenth Amendment. Although presented in a breezy manner, Epps' arguments are grounded in a textual interpretation and scholarly research. He also takes particular joy in exposing the contradictions, false premises, and bad faith behind the conservative myths he targets. Ultimately, it's a polemic of sorts, intended to provide progressives with inspiration and factual ammunition to those who seek to challenge right-wing originalist notions of constitutional interpretation.(Reprinted with permission of Booklist, copyright 2012, American Library Association.)