John Marshall

July 28, 2014
One of the most illustrious members of the Founding generation, John Marshall attended Virginia’s ratifying convention, served in the state legislature and Congress, was a diplomat and Secretary of State, and ultimately became the nation’s most influential Chief Justice. He was also among the best-liked men of his time. But what Unger (Mr. President), a biographer of John Quincy Adams, Noah Webster, and George Washington among others, delivers is more hagiography than biography. To boot, he takes sides in the political conflicts of the early nation. Unger has it in especially for Marshall’s second cousin Thomas Jefferson. Among the “enemies of the federal government” of which he became president, Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, “abandoned the Revolution,” built an “incongruously pretentious home,” had a “mean-spirited gossip” of a daughter, may have made near “treasonous” decisions as governor, wielded “all but dictatorial powers” as president, “unleashed his political attack dogs,” and “nurtured political divisions and chaos.” While its facts are straight, the book’s interpretation is extreme and offers nothing revelatory. Moreover, it lacks the authority of recent studies of Marshall by R. Kent Newmyer and Jean Edward Smith. Maps & illus.

October 1, 2014

In the "Federalist Papers," Alexander Hamilton called the courts "the least dangerous" branch of the proposed central government. John Marshall (1755-1835), chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 until his death, made the judiciary a coequal branch of government that could stand up to Congress and the president. Marshall was a strong leader on the court, pressing for unanimous decisions and few dissenting or concurring opinions and presiding over the landmark Marbury v. Madison decision. The chief justice asserted the right of the courts to declare laws unconstitutional--something British courts could not do--and repeatedly upheld broad powers for the federal government. Unger (The Last Founding Father) is very familiar with the founding fathers, having written about George Washington, Patrick Henry, James Monroe, and John Hancock. His research is heavy on primary sources. The author knows the period a little too well though, because he at times lapses into a history of the era rather than a life of Marshall. The subtitle is a bit misleading since the majority of the book is about Marshall before the Supreme Court. VERDICT Those interested in the founding fathers will appreciate this scholarly, accessible title. Legal-minded readers will want more.--Michael O. Eshleman, Bloomington, IN

Copyright 2014 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.

September 15, 2014
After a sterling career as an officer in the Revolutionary War and as a Virginia politician, John Marshall was appointed by John Adams as chief justice of the Supreme Court. For Adams, defeated in his bid for reelection by Thomas Jefferson, this was the culmination of a last-ditch effort to pack the national court with Federalist-leaning judges. In his 35 years as chief justice, Marshall enhanced the power of the Supreme Court well beyond what Adams would have anticipated. Historian Unger offers a comprehensive account of Marshall's life and career that provides interesting insights into his personal qualities and political sympathies. Roughly half of the book covers Marshall's earlier career as a soldier and politician as well as his family life. But Unger is at his best covering the history-altering judicial activities of the court under Marshall, especially as the court clashed with the executive power of the Jefferson and Jackson administration. Unger's admiration for Marshall sometimes leads him to unfairly demean his opponents, especially Jefferson. Still, this is a well-done tribute to the man who made the judiciary a truly coequal branch of the national government.(Reprinted with permission of Booklist, copyright 2014, American Library Association.)