What Happened To Battlefield Air Interdiction? The Cadre Papers. Army And Air Force Battlefield Doctrine (The Cadre Papers No. 17)

افزودن به بوکمارک اشتراک گذاری 0 دیدگاه کاربران 4 (1)

مشارکت: عنوان و توضیح کوتاه هر کتاب را ترجمه کنید این ترجمه بعد از تایید با نام شما در سایت نمایش داده خواهد شد.

ترجمه این کتاب مشاهده همه کتاب های ترجمه نشده

از خودتان درباره کتاب توضیح کوتاهی بنویسید

The ground and air forces have strong interlocking connections in the battlefield operations known as close air support (CAS). In the 1970s the Army and Air Force began to develop a shared battlefield doctrine known as battlefield air interdiction (BAI) that was concerned with a class of targets that layout a fair distance from the front lines. These targets were be-yond the capability and immediate tactical concern of the ground commander, beyond the area that required detailed co-ordination of each individual CAS mission, but were close enough to have a near-term effect upon surface operation and required a general coordination of both air and ground operations. These became known as "intermediate" targets, and often considered "shallow interdiction" targets closer to the front lines than the traditional "interdiction" targets commonly tasked by and under the control of the air forces. The Air Force and Army worked hand in glove through the seventies to refine and publish battlefield doctrine, best recognized under its Army label, Air Land Battle. Through the eighties Gen Wilbur L. "Bill" Creech, Tactical Air Command commander, Gen. Donald Starry, chief of Army Training and Doctrine Command, and other service leaders worked on a series of historical compromises pertaining to all aspects of the Army-Air Force operations. Not more than 10 years later, on the battlefields of Desert Storm, the Air Force excluded BAI from its tasking orders, al-though some claimed interdiction missions of this nature were carried out under different names. Indeed, the term BAI was removed from doctrinal manuals written after 1990. Was it considered irrelevant or useful doctrine? Did the heightened self-interest of the services explain its removal? Or was the removal a victim of bureaucratic inertia or unique doctrinal presentations? Lt Col Terrance J. McCaffrey III answers these questions in What Happened to BAI? Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001.He traces air-ground doctrine and operational practices relative to battle-field interdiction from World War I to Operation Desert Storm and suggests at one point that even the flank support for Pat-ton was, in effect, BAI. The author carries the discussion through the decade after Desert Storm and shows how the issue is too important to be dropped by either service, even as technology provides new weapons for both services. Colonel McCaffrey concludes that there is still need for a BAI-type mission. Both services are searching for an answer to the doctrinal void. Development is being impeded by a lively trend to speak in the self-interest of one's service. This study illuminates the process that will lead to renew BAI even as the struggle for service missions continue to cause self-interested debate.

لغو

گزارش تخلف

مغایرت عنوان کتاب با توضیحات و تصویر جلد
عدم رعایت حقوق نشر طبق قوانین جمهوری اسلامی ایران
محتوای مستهجن
توهین به قومیتها و محتوای نژادپرستی
توهین به اقیلیتهای مذهبی
اهانت به مقامات سیاسی و مذهبی
اشاعه ی کودک آزاری
سایر موارد

بستن

فرمت کتاب

ebook

زبان

english

نویسنده

Terrance J. McCaffrey III

شابک

9781585661299

20,000 تومان

خرید کتاب مطالعه نمونه درخواست ترجمه کتاب

خرید کتاب What Happened To Battlefield Air Interdiction? The Cadre Papers. Army And Air Force Battlefield Doctrine (The Cadre Papers No. 17)

What Happened To Battlefield Air Interdiction? The Cadre Papers. Army And Air Force Battlefield Doctrine (The Cadre Papers No. 17)

گزارش تخلف

فرمت کتاب

ebook

زبان

english

نویسنده

شابک

کتاب های مرتبط

Does the United States need space-based weapons? (CADRE paper)

Shooting Down a Star

Toward an Air and Space Force : Naval Aviation and the Implications for Space Power

Once in a Blue Moon

Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles

Paradigm Lost

XIX Tactical Air Command and Ultra

The Art of Wing Leadership

The Long Search for a Surgical Strike

Turning The Vertical Flank

The politics of coercion

Thinking Effects

America's First Air Battles : Lessons Learned or Lessons Lost?

What Happened To Battlefield Air Interdiction? The Cadre Papers. Army And Air Force Battlefield Doctrine (The Cadre Papers No. 17)

Time-critical targeting : predictive versus reactionary methods : an analysis for the future

Military chaplains as peace builders : embracing indigenous religions in stability operations

Flying Reactors

BLACK HATS AND WHITE HATS

Airpower, Afghanistan, and the future of warfare : an alternative view

دیدگاه کاربران