The Infidel and the Professor

The Infidel and the Professor
افزودن به بوکمارک اشتراک گذاری 0 دیدگاه کاربران 5 (2)

David Hume, Adam Smith, and the Friendship That Shaped Modern Thought

مشارکت: عنوان و توضیح کوتاه هر کتاب را ترجمه کنید این ترجمه بعد از تایید با نام شما در سایت نمایش داده خواهد شد.
iran گزارش تخلف

فرمت کتاب

ebook

تاریخ انتشار

2017

نویسنده

Dennis C. Rasmussen

نویسنده

Dennis C. Rasmussen

شابک

9781400888467
  • اطلاعات
  • نقد و بررسی
  • دیدگاه کاربران
برای مطالعه توضیحات وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

نقد و بررسی

Kirkus

July 15, 2017
Affecting story of the friendship, intellectual and personal, of David Hume and Adam Smith, two of the greatest exponents of the Scottish Enlightenment.Both Hume and Smith were controversial in their day, writes Rasmussen (Political Science/Tufts Univ.; The Pragmatic Enlightenment: Recovering the Liberalism of Hume, Smith, Montesquieu, and Voltaire, 2013, etc.), and not just for the scandalous lack of religiosity for which the former was especially known. Perhaps a touch more pious, Smith earned a share of trouble for having described "the cheerfulness and equanimity of Hume's final days," during which, the good burghers of Edinburgh were betting, he would turn to God. It didn't happen. Basing his account in part on the letters Hume and Smith exchanged, Rasmussen builds an intellectual biography in which the two evolve from "Dear Smith" and "Dear Hume" to "My Dearest Friend"--that last "an epithet that neither of them used with any other correspondent during the course of their friendship." That friendship extended across two fruitful decades of Scotland's golden age, and Rasmussen wisely does not attempt any presentist shoehorning of Hume as philosopher and Smith as economist but instead allows them the full range of pursuits across many fields. For example, though Hume today is well-known for forays into epistemology, Rasmussen writes discerningly of his "last major literary undertaking," a multivolume history of England. (There is a small irony in Hume's dislike of the English, for which reason we find Smith cajoling Hume to move to England with him: "Let us make short excursions together sometimes to see our friends in France and sometimes to see our friends in Scotland, but let London be the place of our ordinary residence.") Though Rasmussen offers plenty of insights into the personalities of the two, it is their ideas that endure--and that dominate this fine book, touching on morality, mind, and, yes, market. Lively and accessible--of broad interest to readers in philosophy, economics, political science, and other disciplines.

COPYRIGHT(2017) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.



Library Journal

July 1, 2017

David Hume and Adam Smith were best friends. Rasmussen (political science, Tufts Univ.; The Pragmatic Enlightenment) "follows the course of their friendship from their first meeting in 1749 until Hume's death" in 1776. Evidence is drawn from their extant correspondence (56 letters, mostly Hume's; Smith's first surviving letter to Hume dates to 1763), but the life and writings of both men are helpfully situated within a broader Scottish-Enlightenment context. Rasmussen is surely right to highlight their shared skepticism about religion and Hume's pronounced impact on the younger Smith's Wealth of Nations. At times--when ascertaining the direction of intellectual influence--undue importance is placed on the publication dates of his subjects' books. After all, as his masterly account shows, the two frequently shared ideas before publishing them, including on the American crisis. (Some will also think more might have been done to show what Hume meant when he claimed to be "an American in my Principles.") The "Hume-Rousseau Affair" is handled nicely, as is the clamor occasioned by the posthumous publication of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. An appendix reprints Hume's My Own Life and Smith's letter to William Strahan about Hume's final days and character. VERDICT Easy to digest and smart. Recommended.--Mark Spencer, Brock Univ., St. Catharines, Ont.

Copyright 2017 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.




دیدگاه کاربران

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید
|