Brain Storm

March 2, 1998
When white supremacist James Whitlow shoots his wife's lover, a deaf African American sign language teacher, he finds himself a prime candidate for the application of new hate-crime statutes. But is he guilty of a hate crime? Enter his court-appointed lawyer, Joe Watson of Stern, Pale, the best law firm in St. Louis. A research wonk by avocation, an old schoolmate of Whitlow's by chance, young Watson resists pressure from colleagues and family to plea bargain: until all the facts come out, he means to stand by his client. Watson is such a nebbish, however, that it's hard to feel for him, especially since his triumphs occur offstage. He may write one hell of a brief, but as an action figure he often seems superfluous. Myrna Schweich, the tough-talking criminal lawyer he hooks up with, makes the good suggestions; curmudgeonly old Judge Stang explains the points of law; and even Rachel Palmquist, the sexy neuroscientist who wants to operate on Whitlow, gives Watson legal advice. Will he fall for Rachel's brainy charms? Since Watson can't imagine his wife (an unattractive walk-on character) as anything other than the ball and chain to whom he's pledged fidelity, it's difficult to care. Dooling, a lawyer whose White Man's Grave was a 1994 NBA finalist, has taken an intriguing law-school conundrum and grafted it onto a study of white-collar mores. The result is half bull session, half film noir. Yet the novel is saved by its extra-dry sense of satire (the Jamesian nameplay is only the start), faltering only when Dooling seems to ask that we take his characters with a straight face rather than as elements in a sharply drawn lampoon of a society drowning in legalisms. Film rights to Alan Pakula.

December 2, 1997
A National Book Award finalist whose Critical Care is now a Sidney Lumet film, Dooling features a lawyer wrecked by a pro bono murder case.

February 1, 1998
Joe Watson envisions a comfortable future with a venerable law firm until a shrewd federal judge tags him for a pro bono murder case that will test the new Federal Sentencing Guidelines for hate crimes. Joe soon finds himself detached from his firm, separated from his family, and under the scrutiny of a pair of thugs who think he has something that belongs to them. A sexy forensic neurologist and a peppery criminal lawyer may or may not be in his corner. Joe doesn't fall into the lawyer-as-detective stereotype that usually signals lots of fast action, and the prose is demanding, with lots of legalese as well as some neurological theorizing. It's Dooling's skillful characterizations (especially cut-'em-off-at-the-knees Judge Stang) that drive the story, along with the complex racial and constitutional issues at the heart of the case. Dooling wants us to stop and think about our rights and freedoms, and his passion for the law pulls us breathlessly along. An obvious choice for Grisham and Turow fans. ((Reviewed February 1, 1998))(Reprinted with permission of Booklist, copyright 1998, American Library Association.)