Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel's Autism
My Journey as a Vaccine Scientist, Pediatrician, and Autism Dad
سفر من به عنوان یک دانشمند واکسیناسیون، پزشک اطفال، و پدر اوتیسم
کتاب های مرتبط
- اطلاعات
- نقد و بررسی
- دیدگاه کاربران
نقد و بررسی
September 1, 2018
Hotez's personal and professional life coincide to make him the ultimate defense against the anti-vaxx (antivaccine proponents who argue that vaccines are more dangerous than the diseases they prevent) movement. As an MD, PhD specializing in tropical pediatrics and vaccine development, the author proves an excellent resource for questioning readers, although he points out that the anti-vaxx movement has painted him as a shill for pharmaceutical companies. Offering a primer on the basics of vaccines--how they work, why they are important--he helps readers prepare for a more public-health, statistics-based discussion of vaccines. The author's more compelling writing is personal and centers on his daughter Rachel, who has autism. Interweaving his own remembrances with wife Ann's recollections, he relates why people might conflate autism with certain vaccines, using Rachel as his primary example. While not a fluid writer, his clarity of thought and clear ethical determination make this a satisfying, quick read. VERDICT Recommended for popular science readers looking to refute the antivaccination debate as well as readers interested in children's public health.--Rachel M. Minkin, Michigan State Univ. Libs., East Lansing
Copyright 2018 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.
دیدگاه کاربران