Exploring Happiness
From Aristotle to Brain Science
- اطلاعات
- نقد و بررسی
- دیدگاه کاربران
نقد و بررسی
September 13, 2010
For as long as human beings have been capable of articulating needs beyond basic survival, one subject has occupied their thoughts perhaps more than any other: happiness. How do we achieve it? How do we maintain it? If it springs from deception (of self or others), as has been suggested, is it any less valid? Thinkers great and small have wrestled with questions such as these for millennia. Bok seeks to synthesize differing opinion and explore the many views on happiness—from philosophers to neuroscientists—and organizes her findings around themes such as luck, illusion, and transience. Happiness is such a subjective concept that it's difficult to imagine an author managing to even touch on it, let alone offer a comprehensive survey. Still, Bok culls a careful collection of thoughts into a surprisingly dense philosophical examination, chronicling what great thinkers have had to say about the subject. Though the title may suggest something from the self-help shelf, this is indeed an exploration, not a guide; readers who want help getting happy should look elsewhere.
October 15, 2010
In this wide-ranging study, Bok (senior visiting fellow, Harvard Ctr. for Population & Development Studies: Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life) endeavors to survey happiness from a variety of perspectives rather than to advance an overarching thesis about it. A well-known moral philosopher, she discusses experiences of people who have described being happy, reflections of philosophers about happiness, and experimental results of brain scientists and psychologists who have studied happiness. She often talks about Robert Nozick's posited Experience Machine, a device programmed to give us any experiences we want. Like Nozick, she thinks that experience--the "inside" dimension of life--is by itself inadequate. Among the scientific investigations that interest Bok are attempts to measure happiness and studies of the "hedonic treadmill," i.e., the tendency to keep one's level of happiness constant while responding only briefly to the ups and downs of life. Bok argues that the pursuit of happiness should not be all consuming. People need to limit the search for happiness by moral constraints. Like Kant, she places particular emphasis on truthfulness. VERDICT Bok's fluently written book is an outstanding guide to a topic sure to interest the general reader as well as specialists in philosophy, psychology, and brain science.--David Gordon, Bowling Green State Univ., OH
Copyright 2010 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.
Starred review from September 1, 2010
Confronted by a welter of conflicting definitions, eighteenth-century poet Alexander Pope despaired of establishing a meaning for happiness. Less easily discouraged, Bok acknowledges the contradictions in the diversity of perspectives, yet she converts these contradictions into openings for deeper inquiry. Readers will contemplate the tension between, for instance, Senecas insistence on virtue as the basis for happiness and La Mettries affirmation of self-indulgence as its true fount. In a wide-ranging survey of philosophical thought, readers weigh contrasting claims about happiness proffered by the joyfully devout and the bemusedly skeptical; by the gregarious socialite and the introspective recluse; by the champions of genetic determinism and the defenders of individual agency. Merely examining such a diverse range of theories will enrich readers thinking. Bok, however, looks to modern research to winnow wheat from chaff. Investigations in neurophysiology, for example, have exploded long-held assumptions about how optimism generates happiness. Survey sociology has now discredited Aristotles claim that advancing age means diminished happiness. Still, some knotty questions resist empirical assessment: Is true happiness the piercing exultation of a singular moment, or the gratifying culmination of an entire lifetime? What, in any case, guarantees happiness hereafter? Bok lifts her topic above merely subjective opinion into a probing intellectual analysis.(Reprinted with permission of Booklist, copyright 2010, American Library Association.)
دیدگاه کاربران