Get Rid of the Performance Review!

Get Rid of the Performance Review!
افزودن به بوکمارک اشتراک گذاری 0 دیدگاه کاربران 4 (1)

How Companies Can Stop Intimidating, Start Managing—and Focus on What Really Matters

مشارکت: عنوان و توضیح کوتاه هر کتاب را ترجمه کنید این ترجمه بعد از تایید با نام شما در سایت نمایش داده خواهد شد.
iran گزارش تخلف

فرمت کتاب

audiobook

تاریخ انتشار

2010

نویسنده

Samuel A. Culbert

ناشر

Hachette Audio

شابک

9781607881766

کتاب های مرتبط

  • اطلاعات
  • نقد و بررسی
  • دیدگاه کاربران
برای مطالعه توضیحات وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

نقد و بررسی

Publisher's Weekly

July 26, 2010
With clear, straightforward (and sometimes profane) language, Culbert (Beyond BullshH t) outlines his strategy for creating a “dynamic setting where employees joyfully live up to their potential.” Culbert attacks the review process as “self-serving, biased opinion cloaked in a numerical package of claimed objectivity and stated as essential to organizational results.” After examining the archaic system with humor and precision, Culbert outlines the shift in mindset that he feels will be necessary to create a more productive working climate. He illustrates his ideas with narratives from his own experience, first-hand tales of woe from stakeholders in the review process, and useful analogies. In addition to advocating for the end of the performance review currently in use, Culbert assails the idea of pay for performance, using humor and insight to outline win-win strategies for managers, decision makers, and even rank and file employees.



Library Journal

August 1, 2010

Culbert (management, UCLA; Beyond Bullsh*t), together with Wall Street Journal senior editor Rout, condemn the practice of performance reviews, contending that rather than motivating employees to do better, performance reviews instead demoralize and discourage them. At the root of their campaign against reviews is what appears to be a vendetta against HR departments, whom they compare to the KGB. While the authors detail the faults of the performance review in depth, they fail to flesh out fully their proposed alternative, the "preview," whereby performance issues would be addressed as they occur and subordinates would have the opportunity to rate their employers' performances. Their criticism, while largely valid, is overly repetitive, and they do not speak to legal issues, which would have been helpful. Culbert's narration is somewhat garbled and stilted. An optional purchase. [Includes a bonus interview with the author.--Ed.]--Risa Getman, Hendrick Hudson Free Lib., Montrose, NY

Copyright 2010 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.




دیدگاه کاربران

دیدگاه خود را بنویسید
|