To the Ramparts
How Bush and Obama Paved the Way for the Trump Presidency, and Why It Isn't Too Late to Reverse Course
کتاب های مرتبط
- اطلاعات
- نقد و بررسی
- دیدگاه کاربران
نقد و بررسی
August 1, 2018
The consumer gadfly and former third-party candidate continues to offer answers to the nation's political problems.Having published one book of letters he had written to presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama without receiving any response (Return to Sender, 2015), Nader returns with imaginary letters he would have written to those presidents during times of crisis, an imagined encounter between Obama and the ghost of Osama bin Laden, and various lists "to promote a people's agenda." The author recognizes that in the public eye, he has been branded with "the politically bigoted word 'spoiler' " since his Green Party candidacy might have tipped the 2000 election of Bush over Al Gore, but he insists that Bernie Sanders played the same role and faced the same charges: "The unfortunate truth Bernie discovered was that anybody who challenges the positions of the corporatist, militaristic, Wall Street-funded Democrats, led by Hillary Clinton...is, by their twisted definition, a 'spoiler.' " Not that there was all that much to spoil, in Nader's analysis, though he never says that the Democrats would be as bad as "the self-destructive, unstable, unorganized, fact- and truth-starved, egomaniacal, bigoted, cheating, plutocratic Donald Trump." However, he holds what he calls "the ObamaBush White House" responsible for the rise of Trump and chastises Obama for not targeting his predecessor as "a war criminal." Nader draws from old clippings and some of his own writing at the time to make familiar complaints about Obama governing more toward the center after campaigning as more of a progressive and about the claims of progressivism by the hawkish and corporate-funded Hillary. He insists that the Electoral College, responsible for Trump's victory, is "antiquated, atavistic," and way overdue for reform, if not removal. For the most part, though, he seems to want to have a direct voice in this discussion rather than shouting from far away on the sidelines.Despite the occasional good point, Nader's current influence extends no farther than preaching to the choir.
COPYRIGHT(2018) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
August 27, 2018
Longtime activist Nader links the rise of President Trump and decline of the Democratic Party to the latter’s turn away from being champions of a “people’s agenda” in this uneven recent history of and jeremiad against corporatist American politics. While Nader is at pains to be clear that he finds the Democrats preferable to Republicans in some policy areas, he argues that their litany of failures in the economic realm is the main reason the party has lost power. He also identifies structural problems with American democracy and calls for top-down “necessary reforms,” offering an eight-point platform—which includes a minimum wage hike, military cuts to fund public works, and conversion to renewable energy—that Democratic candidates could adopt in order to win the support of wide swaths of the electorate. The presentation can at times distract from his ideas: fictional passages are full of oddly dramatic flourishes (in one, Barack Obama consents to chat with the ghost of Osama bin Laden “as long as you remain hovering and do not attempt to defile this solemn room”) and the reproduction of numerous, sometimes pages-long chiding letters to major political figures may grate on even avowed Nader fans (especially given the 2015 book compiling his letters to Presidents Bush and Obama). But readers who don’t mind those elements will find well-argued ideas here.
دیدگاه کاربران